Who writes SoftwareTestPilot articles?
A small team of working QA engineers — the authors listed on this page. Every article carries a named byline and links back to that author's bio here. We are an independent publication, so the same handful of people write and review the whole library rather than a rotating pool of freelancers.
Are your guides reviewed for accuracy?
Yes. Every technical article is reviewed by a senior QA engineer before publication. We validate code samples against the current stable release of each tool (Playwright, Selenium, Cypress, Postman, JMeter, k6) and re-run them when a major version ships.
How often is content updated?
We restamp Last Updated whenever the underlying tool, salary band, or interview format shifts — typically 60–120 days for evergreen guides and immediately for breaking changes like Selenium 4.28, Playwright 1.50, or a new ISTQB syllabus revision.
Do you accept guest posts?
Occasionally, and only from practising testers who can point to real work. We do not publish unlabelled sponsored content or scraped tutorials. Pitch us with a writing sample and a proposed outline.
How do I report a factual error?
Email softwaretestingsapiens@gmail.com with the article URL and the correction. We aim to acknowledge within 24 business hours and publish a fix within 72 hours, with an update note at the top of the article.
Do you use AI to write content?
Yes, as a drafting and research tool — and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise. AI helps us gather sources, produce first drafts and check grammar. A named human QA engineer then restructures the piece, verifies every technical claim, runs the code samples and signs off before publication. Data-backed sections (salary bands, skill demand, job counts) come from our own Jobs Radar dataset, not from a model.